Bob McCullouch Is “Defending” the Darren Wilson Case to the Grand Jury!

Bob McCullouch doesn’t really want to indict Darren Wilson.  He doesn’t feel he committed a crime!  His past performances make it clear he doesn’t view a police officer, especially a white one, killing an unarmed black “suspect”‘ to be a criminal act under any circumstances! Ferguson Prosecutor Robert P. McCulloch’s Long History of Siding With the PolicePema Levy, August 29, 2014 Newsweek

However, there is the inconvenient accounts of several witnesses, many of whom are independent, that Mike Brown had his hands up in apparent surrender when he was killed.  Additionally, there is the annoying evidence that Wilson fatally shot Mike Brown from a distance of 35 to 100 feet. Notwithstanding what might have occurred in the car, how could Brown, unarmed, with his hands allegedly raised, pose enough of a threat to justify Wilson killing him?  In light of these circumstances, the worldwide publicity the case has generated and the uncomfortable civil disturbances, McCullouch, is forced to seek an indictment, or at least, pretend to.

McCullouhc’s novel approach to “seeking” an indictment while evading it, is well briefed in this excellent article: Bob McCulloch’s grand jury charade: County Prosecutor shows how to not get an indictmentOctober 14, 2014, Jerryl T. Christmas, The St. Louis American.

Yes, McCullouch is only “seeking” an indictment because he feels compelled to do so.  Of course, he is doing everything to avoid getting the indictment he supposedly wants. It is like a Tom and Jerry cartoon!  They may be cat and mouse but Tom only pretends to chase Jerry when the housekeeper is watching!

Yes, the old saw is that a grand jury will indict a ham sandwich. That is because the grand jury is a tool of the prosecutor! He or she controls the evidence that is placed before it and he or she has no obligations to the defendant.  In other words, a grand jury will follow the lead of the prosecutor…even if that leads away from an indictment!

McCullouch is acting like a defense attorney, not a prosecutor. According to leaks, he allowed the defendant to testify for four hours!  Ferguson officer appears before grand jury on shooting of Michael BrownSeptember 17, 2014, 

As Attorneys Christmas and John Rogers point out, the only reason the defendant’s attorneys accepted McCullouch’s invitation to have their client testify is because that very invitation signaled that McCullouch wants to indict Wilson about as much as Wilson wants to be indicted!  McCullouch and Wilson are like Tom and Jerry! Their adversarial relationship is a facade. McCullouch might as well be Wilson’s preemptive defense attorney!  If there is no indictment, there is no trial!

No need to subject poor Mr. Wilson to a trial!  There are many drawbacks to such an event…(1) No secrecy (not that it has been observed in practice…not only have there been leaks, but they have all favored Wilson)  However, a full-blown trial allows everyone to see all the evidence, see the witnesses cross-examined and allows full discovery! Consequently, as in the Trayvon Martin case, the entire nation would be informed enough to view an acquittal, in contravention of the evidence, as a travesty; (2) A trial could actually result in a conviction, however remote that possibility might be. Better to make sure it doesn’t get to that stage!

Now the grand jury has seen McCullouch seek indictments against other potential defendants so they know how its done!  They see how McCullouch approaches Wilson’s case and realize he would never afford another criminal defendant the privileges he is affording Mr. Wilson.  Of course, Mr. Wilson is not just any criminal defendant to McCullouch and the grand jury sees that!

That’s why McCullouch is presenting all the evidence in the case to the grand jury without seeking a specific charge.  He forces them to have to assume his job, i.e., parsing through all of it.  The grand jury must go beyond the bounds of what they are impaneled to do, which is simply to see if there is probable cause for an indictment, which there is. They must now exceed the responsibilities and tasks of a normal grand jury and try the case. Quoting from Attorney Christmas’ article:

McCulloch’s decision to present every piece of evidence to the grand jury is a delay tactic, which in my experience overwhelms the grand jury and usually ends up with a vote not to indict. Keep in mind, this is just a “probable cause” hearing – the grand jury is not determining “guilt or innocence,” which happens at the actual trial. The grand jury doesn’t really need every piece of evidence to determine “probable cause.”

Now the grand jury deliberations are secret (well in theory) as opposed to a trial jury, and there is no discovery or cross-examination.  Thus grand juries are not designed to try cases.  It is not fair to either party!  That explains why McCullouch wants to successfully “defend” the case at the grand jury stage.  Of course, the many leaks of testimony and evidence solely favoring Wilson imply that McCullouch will indeed “win” the case. St. Louis County prosecutor expresses faith in grand jury, 10/31/14, Trymaine Lee, MSNBC

Darren Wilson could not have a better defense attorney than Bob McCullouch, the “prosecutor” and we are the “housekeeper.”


This entry was posted in racism. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Bob McCullouch Is “Defending” the Darren Wilson Case to the Grand Jury!

  1. scrodriguez says:

    Due process? are they kidding? Due process only assures the accused that he will be given a fair trial while his rights are still protected. I know damn well if I go out and shoot someone down like that they are not going to have a Grand Jury assemble and let them decide.
    What will happen is I will be taken into custody, book and charged with in 72 hours. From there I will also have a bond hearing and lets be honest it will be either an insane amount or no bail at all.
    yet Wilson has the prosecution on his team who also helped raise money for his defense and decided to allow him enough time to skip town scrub his social media accounts etc…. Wouldnt this make them accessories? I mean its a clear obvious cover up….

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yes, its a cover up alright! Darren Wilson never filled out an incident report so that he would be able to tailor his story to witness accounts. The Ferguson and St. Louis police departments did not release his “story” despite “sunshine” laws. Their only concern was protecting Darren Wilson. Protect and Serve?

      Liked by 2 people

      • scrodriguez says:

        Wilson is not supposed to its actually the duty of the watch captin per their policy they really better do the right thing here and un fuck the damage they caused out there

        Liked by 1 person

  2. 2dogsonly says:

    This case mimics Zimmerman’s exactly. That was a trial for show only and a decades experienced prosecutor presented the case like a new prosecutor. Fumble, mis leading evidence, no objections when anyone without any legal training would and did know evidence was ridiculous. It was a big wake up to the world on how to prosecute a case in name only.
    Ferguson is following this same scenario down the exact path. Is there a ” how to” book for prosecutors to follow when they only want to make a ” show” of justice?

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s